Your turn: Are donations for elected officials’ legal defense subject to public disclosure?

Let’s say there is an elected official who, for whatever reason, has to hire an advocate to represent her in a court of law. If the ensuing legal fees amount to more than the official can personally afford, and that official asks friends for donations to help pay said fees, do those donations

A) belong with the official’s campaign finance disclosure records?
B) need to be reported, but separately from campaign finance records?
C) not need to be publicly disclosed?
D) fall in some other category not defined above?

Go ahead and weigh in with your thoughts, and I’ll post my analysis as a follow-up.

Bhalla draws a plan for citizen involvement

Ron Bhalla, the newest candidate to seek the GOP nomination in Tennessee’s Third Congressional District, wants to change how business is done in the U.S. House of Representatives. In an interview on Monday, he said that he would communicate every bill to his constituents, and based on a majority opinion of their responses, would cast his vote as a mere vessel to communicate the district’s will. “I’m going empty-handed,” he said quietly.

Bhalla shuffled quickly through photocopied sketches of how he perceives the current process vs. how he says he will operate, if elected. Stick figures and flowchart shapes depict what Bhalla says is a “disconnect” between an elected representative’s constituents and the votes cast by said representative, while there is a clear connection between the elected official and a combination of lobbyists, the national party, and other powerful interests. On the next page, there is a direct line connecting the constituents to their representative.

When asked how he would avoid becoming yet another well-meaning politician who packs up and heads to the Capitol with the best intentions, only to be sucked into the prevailing political machine, Bhalla smiles. He points to a printed pledge he says that, as signed, will protect against such influence. He also says that since special interests will have no response from him, they will quickly decide he is not worth their efforts.

Instead, the plan is to ask the district’s voters to weigh in on each bill that is up for deliberation. (Various communication solutions are being considered for executing this.) Whatever fifty percent plus one decide, says Bhalla, is how he will vote. His campaign assistant, Ken Orr, quickly added that the only override would be when a bill was clearly unconstitutional.

Votes on pending legislation aren’t the only thing on which Bhalla says he will seek direct input from constituents. He will ask citizens to set his salary, too, “from zero to the full extent” set by Congress, depending on the voters’ assessment of his performance.

Bhalla, who originally hails from India, faces two formidable opponents in Congressman Chuck Fleischmann and the incumbent’s immediate predecessor’s scion, Weston Wamp, both of whom have demonstrated an ability to raise lots of campaign cash. Dr. Jean “Lady J” Howard-Hill is also running for the nomination. Bhalla says he is not aiming to compete for the large donors, adding that he does not want to be a “puppet.”

Chattanooga attorney J.B. Bennett released a statement saying that he is not running. Two other potential candidates still apparently deciding are Savas Kyriakidis and Tres Wittum.

Tennessee congressional incumbents raise millions for 2012

A Gannett report last week identified U.S. Rep. Stephen Fincher as the top recipient of campaign funds among Tennessee’s U.S. House delegation in the most recent reporting period (July – September 2011).

A quick glance at OpenSecrets.org shows that U.S. Rep. John J. “Jimmy” Duncan is the House member with the most cash on-hand, with $1,534,506. U.S. Sen. Bob Corker is sitting on more than $6.5 million.

In the Third District, U.S. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann shows a total of $410,439 raised so far in the 2012 election cycle. Fleischmann hosts U.S. House Speaker John Boehner at a fundraiser later this week. A donation of $1,000 will get one into the general reception; a $2,500 check means a photo opportunity with the Speaker.

No numbers are yet available for Fleischmann’s GOP primary rivals, Jean Howard-Hill and Weston Wamp.

In the Eighth District, independent candidate James Hart has raised $502 compared to Fincher’s $943,564.

In the Ninth District, Tomeka Hart, a Democratic Party primary challenger to incumbent U.S. Rep. Steve Cohen, has reported zero dollars raised. Cohen has raised close to a quarter million dollars.

Three is a crowd—better bring 40,000 of your best friends

Well, that’s a wrap…ture. The 2011 session of the 107th General Assembly has ended, and as Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey pointed out in a released statement, the final gavel came down earlier than it usually does.

Lt. Gov. Ramsey (R-Blountville) today praised the General Assembly’s leadership and members for an extremely productive and efficient session. The General Assembly has not adjourned earlier than this date since 1998 and the Senate used fewer legislative days than any year since 1999. It is estimated that the state will save around $450,000 by adjourning earlier than last year.

“I am very proud of this General Assembly,” Ramsey stated. “I think we will look back on this year as a benchmark for how the legislature should function. The members and staff did great work and served the taxpayers by doing it quickly and efficiently. Considering the substantial obstacles posed by the transition of a new Governor and the election of a new House Speaker, it is truly a credit to all involved that we were able to conclude so quickly.”

Here is a partial rundown of the Legislature’s actions (and inactions) this session that affect elections.

We ID
Voters will be required to present a valid photo ID when requesting a ballot. If one does not have a photo ID, a provisional ballot will be provided. Indigents and those who have religious objections to being photographed will have to complete an affidavit. (HB0007 / SB0016)

Super duper
Tennessee may play a more prominent role in deciding that Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels will be the 2012 GOP nominee (this just in: he’s not running) on the first Tuesday in March. Then again, we may be lost in the sea of states holding presidential preference primaries that day. Either way, the date has been moved. Also, the qualifying deadline for county primaries, and for any municipal elections that happen to coincide with the presidential primary, has been moved back. (HB0612 / SB0599)

Three is a crowd—better bring 40,000 of your best friends
At long last, after a federal court ruled that Tennessee’s ballot access laws were unconstitutionally restrictive, change has come. Get ready to see new party labels beside the names of the same old kooks and gadflies that always run as independents. (I’m kidding. Mostly.) Sen. Jim Kyle, a Democrat from Memphis, had wanted to lower the signature barrier to 10,000—ostensibly his motive was to encourage GOP-weakening Tea Party candidacies—but the threshold “at least 2.5 percent of the total number of votes cast for gubernatorial candidates in the most recent election of governor” remains intact. I’ll say it again: having Democrats and Republicans argue over third party ballot rights is more than a little absurd. The new law still assumes a dominant two-party system, and ignores the fact that someday coalitions may be the norm instead of “winner-take-all” party rule. But it’s a start. (HB0794 / SB0935)

Paper trail goes cold
All but two of Tennessee’s 95 counties jumped onto the paperless electronic voting machine bandwagon after Congress authorized millions in upgrade money following the 2000 presidential election debacle. In 2008, the General Assembly expressed its hindsight-induced regrets with the Voter Confidence Act, which would require a paper ballot for every voter. But state election officials balked at the costs to switch out systems yet again, and found support in the Republican-led Legislature. Democrats cried foul, saying that the GOP is trying to take away protections against potential mishap or misdeed. But who was in charge when the state ran pell-mell towards touch-screen DREs? Yeah, that’s right. (HB0386 / SB1203)

Reclaiming the American dream

Jackson Miller shares his must-read thoughts (c’mon, what else are you doing this morning?) on what he sees as the three most essential freedoms we Americans celebrate today. He also warns that we have largely abandoned our duty to uphold those same freedoms. The article is a poignant combination of gratitude and prophetic admonishment. Here are a couple of excerpts:

We seem to have lost it. We fight over wedge issues like abortion, gay marriage, the display of the 10 commandments, and whether or not Obama is a Muslim. There is a powerful contingent in this country that wants to use the laws of the kingdom to require people to act the way they believe. While the Pilgrims may have agreed with many of their conservative stances, they would also certainly recognize the religious oppression.

The same kind of thing is happening with the freedom of thought.

Freedom of Enterprise is the American Dream. It is the idea that anyone can work hard and build something of value in the US. You can be born a pauper and grow into a self-made millionaire. We have all heard the stories and there are several of in my family. My worry is that my kids will not have the same opportunity. At least, not to the same degree.

One of my early mentors told me that “Americans are great at building systems, but even better at finding ways around them.” As we grow as a nation, the wealth of the wealthy compounds and with it comes an increase in power – a power that is used to manipulate systems. What has been happening for the past decade or two is that the average American is getting deeper in debt and making less money. The middle class is shrinking and it has been for a long time. This is the threat to the Freedom of Enterprise.